Pengaruh Mengajar Yang Bervariasi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa di SMP ELPIDA Kelas VII
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/corammundo.v3i2.380Keywords:
Teaching, Learning Achievement, Classroom research strategyAbstract
This study is based on the fact that the need for competent teachers in the learning process is very necessary, because the main problem in this study is how much influence varies teaching on student learning achievement in ELPIDA Junior High School (Class VII) and how effective the implementation of varied teaching is on student learning achievement in ELPIDA Junior High School (Class VII). The method used in this study is Quantitative research with a classroom research strategy. Based on the results of the research conducted, it shows that with this student achievement, teachers can find out "whether the application of varied teaching affects student learning achievement" at ELPIDA Junior High School. From the results of the simple regression analysis, it can be concluded that the influence of varying teaching on student learning achievement is very high, namely the diterminant coefficient / KP 29.1% and the value of variable relationships is greater than the standard table, which is 0.980 > 0.428 based on these calculations, then the H1 hypothesis is accepted. Thus, the hypothesis that teaching varies has a significant effect on learning performance in Elpida Junior High School grade VII, has been proven.
References
Adinegoro. (1954). Ensiklopedia Umum, Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: CV Bulan Bintang.
Djiwandono, W. S. E. (2003). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Erwintri. (2014, May 16). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Prestasi Belajar. Diakses dari http://www.erwintri.wordpress.com.
Fathurrohma, F. (2012). Strategi Belajar Mengajar (Cet-2). Bandung: PT Rafika Aditama.
Hamalik, O. (2003). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Harjanto. (1997). Perencanaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Icrixs. (n.d.). Ketrampilan Mengajar Guru. Diakses dari http://icrixs.wordpress.com/education/ketrampilan-mengajar-guru/.
Nasution, S. (1993). Didaktif Asas-asas Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Prasetya, E., & Al. (1995). Teori Belajar, Motivasi dan Ketrampilan (Cet-5). Jakarta: PPAI.
Ratnawati, M. (1996). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Anak dan Suasana Keluarga. Jurnal Anima, XI.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Saondi, O., & Dkk. (2012). Etika Profesi Keguruan (Cet-2). Bandung: Rafika Aditama.
Saud, S. U. (2010). Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sijabat, S. B. (1993). Mengajar Secara Profesional, Mewujudkan Visi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Kalam Hidup.
Soetjipto, P. (2009). Profesi Keguruan (Cet-1). Jakarta: Rineka Cita.
Subagio, B. A. (1998). Pengembangan dan Pembaharuan Kompetensi Profesional: Implikasi Bagi Hamba Tuhan dan Sekolah Tinggi Theologia di Abad-21. Pasca, 1(1). Semarang: LLPM Bukit Simongan.
Subagio, B. A. (2004). Pengantar Riset Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Kalam Hidup.
Sukmadinata, S. N. (2007). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Susan, E., & Singarimbum, M. (1991). Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: 43 ES.
Sutrisna, H. (1973). Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: UGM.
Syah, M. (2000). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru (Cet-5). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Umar, H. (2000). Riset Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen. Jakarta: JBRJ.
Vembriarta, D., & Dkk. (1994). Kamus Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Wragg, T., & Dunne, R. (1996). Pembelajaran Efektif. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.